Purpose: The open abdomen (OA) procedure as part of damage control surgery represents a significant surgical advance in severe intra-abdominal infections. Major techniques used for OA are negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) and non-NPWT. The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate the effects of different abdominal closure methods and their outcomes in patients presenting with abdominal sepsis treated with OA. Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed clinical outcomes of patients affected by severe intra-abdominal sepsis treated with OA. Demographic features, mortality prediction score, abdominal closure methods, length of hospital stay, complications and mortality rates of patients were determined and compared. Results: This study included 106 patients, of whom 77 underwent OA with NPWT and 29 with non-NPWT. OA duration was longer in NPWT patients (p = 0.007). In-hospital mortality rates in NPWT and in non-NPWT patients were 40.3% and 51.7%, respectively (p = 0.126), with an overall 30-day mortality rate of 18.2% and 51.7%, respectively (p = 0.0002). After emergency colorectal surgery, patients who underwent OA with NPWT had a lower rate of colostomy (p = 0.025). Conclusions: NPWT is the best temporary abdominal closure technique to decrease mortality and colostomy rates in patients managed with OA for severe intra-abdominal infections.

Open abdomen closure methods for severe abdominal sepsis: a retrospective cohort study / Poillucci, G.; Podda, M.; Russo, G.; Perri, S. G.; Ipri, D.; Manetti, G.; Lolli, M. G.; De Angelis, R.. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND EMERGENCY SURGERY. - ISSN 1863-9933. - 47:6(2021), pp. 1819-1825. [10.1007/s00068-020-01379-0]

Open abdomen closure methods for severe abdominal sepsis: a retrospective cohort study

Poillucci G.;Lolli M. G.;
2021

Abstract

Purpose: The open abdomen (OA) procedure as part of damage control surgery represents a significant surgical advance in severe intra-abdominal infections. Major techniques used for OA are negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) and non-NPWT. The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate the effects of different abdominal closure methods and their outcomes in patients presenting with abdominal sepsis treated with OA. Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed clinical outcomes of patients affected by severe intra-abdominal sepsis treated with OA. Demographic features, mortality prediction score, abdominal closure methods, length of hospital stay, complications and mortality rates of patients were determined and compared. Results: This study included 106 patients, of whom 77 underwent OA with NPWT and 29 with non-NPWT. OA duration was longer in NPWT patients (p = 0.007). In-hospital mortality rates in NPWT and in non-NPWT patients were 40.3% and 51.7%, respectively (p = 0.126), with an overall 30-day mortality rate of 18.2% and 51.7%, respectively (p = 0.0002). After emergency colorectal surgery, patients who underwent OA with NPWT had a lower rate of colostomy (p = 0.025). Conclusions: NPWT is the best temporary abdominal closure technique to decrease mortality and colostomy rates in patients managed with OA for severe intra-abdominal infections.
2021
abdominal sepsis; bogota-bag; emergency surgery; negative pressure wound therapy; open abdomen; abdomen; humans; retrospective studies; abdominal wound closure techniques; intraabdominal infections; negative-pressure wound therapy; sepsis
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Open abdomen closure methods for severe abdominal sepsis: a retrospective cohort study / Poillucci, G.; Podda, M.; Russo, G.; Perri, S. G.; Ipri, D.; Manetti, G.; Lolli, M. G.; De Angelis, R.. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND EMERGENCY SURGERY. - ISSN 1863-9933. - 47:6(2021), pp. 1819-1825. [10.1007/s00068-020-01379-0]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Poillucci_Abdomen_2021.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 631.07 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
631.07 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1658216
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 8
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 6
social impact